All posts

12 May 2026

What actually changed in the NSW WHS Regulation amendments

A plain-English commentary on the recent psychosocial and silica amendments — what they require, who they apply to, and what to update in your pack.

Theo Tjokrosaputro
Co-founder, PolicyPack
4 min read1,037 wordsregulationnswpsychosocialsilica
ShareTwitterLinkedIn

There have been three meaningful amendments to the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2017 (NSW) over the last 24 months. The trade press covered them. The compliance consultancies sent newsletters. Most small businesses missed all of it because the language was inaccessible and the practical implications were unclear.

Here's the plain-English version, with what it actually means for your documentation.

The psychosocial amendments

NSW formally introduced a duty to manage psychosocial hazards in October 2022, and the corresponding Code of Practice was issued by SafeWork NSW in May 2023. The amendments aren't new, but the regulator's enforcement posture has materially shifted in the last twelve months. As of 2025, SafeWork NSW inspectors are now routinely asking to see psychosocial risk assessments during workplace visits, not just safety incidents.

What the duty actually requires

A PCBU must, so far as is reasonably practicable, eliminate psychosocial risks. If elimination isn't reasonably practicable, the risk must be minimised. The hazards in scope, per Schedule 1A of the Regulation, include:

  • High job demands and low job demands.
  • Low job control and low role clarity.
  • Poor support from management or colleagues.
  • Poor workplace relationships, including conflict.
  • Inadequate reward and recognition.
  • Workplace violence and aggression.
  • Bullying.
  • Harassment, including sexual harassment.
  • Exposure to traumatic events or material.

These are not optional categories. The Regulation requires a PCBU to consider each one and document the controls.

What it means for your pack

If you have a Mental Health and Wellbeing Policy from before late 2022 and you haven't reviewed it, it is almost certainly missing the structural risk assessment that the new Code of Practice requires. A pre-amendment policy typically reads as an aspirational document — we value the wellbeing of our team — and lists Employee Assistance Program contact numbers. That isn't sufficient anymore.

A post-amendment Mental Health and Wellbeing policy must include:

  1. A risk assessment that walks through each of the nine hazard categories above.
  2. A control hierarchy for each — elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE — even though for psychosocial hazards the controls are mostly administrative (workload caps, rotation, support availability, complaint mechanisms).
  3. A register of incidents, including near-misses (an aborted bullying complaint, a recovered burnout absence).
  4. An annual review cycle with documented outcomes.

PolicyPack's Mental Health and Wellbeing policy was rewritten against the post-amendment structure in November 2023 and is now generated to that standard by default for any pack with NSW selected as the primary jurisdiction.

The silica amendments

The federal ban on the manufacture, supply, processing, and installation of engineered stone took effect on 1 July 2024. NSW has gone further. The WHS Regulation amendment effective from 1 September 2024 imposes additional obligations on any business performing crystalline silica processing — not just engineered stone.

What it covers

The amendment captures any work that generates respirable crystalline silica dust. That includes:

  • Cutting, grinding, polishing, drilling, or sanding natural stone, concrete, brick, masonry, or composite materials.
  • Tile cutting (a lot of bathroom and kitchen renovations).
  • Concrete cutting and core drilling.
  • Bricklaying involving the cutting of bricks.
  • Demolition of any structure containing concrete, brick, or stone.

It does not require that the material be engineered stone. Any silica-bearing material is in scope.

What's required

For any "high-risk crystalline silica work" — defined by the amendment as work involving uncontrolled cutting, grinding, polishing, or drilling — a PCBU must:

  1. Conduct an air monitoring assessment.
  2. Implement engineering controls (water suppression or local exhaust ventilation) before any administrative or PPE-only control.
  3. Provide health monitoring to workers, including periodic chest X-rays.
  4. Maintain a silica exposure register for each worker.
  5. Provide approved respiratory protective equipment when residual exposure remains.

What it means for your pack

Construction packs generated for NSW after September 2024 now include a Crystalline Silica Management Plan as a default-on document for any business indicating they perform tiling, concreting, bricklaying, or demolition. Pre-amendment packs do not contain this document. If your last pack is from before September 2024 and you do any of this work, the document is missing and the WHS Policy clauses on dust hazards are out of date.

The Industrial Manslaughter Bill

Worth flagging, even though it doesn't change your operational documents directly. The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Industrial Manslaughter) Act 2024 (NSW) commenced in June 2024. It created an offence of industrial manslaughter, punishable by up to 25 years' imprisonment for individuals and up to $20m for corporations.

The offence is triggered by a death caused by gross negligence in respect of a WHS duty. The practical effect is that prosecutors now have an explicit pathway to charge directors, officers, and PCBUs personally, where previously the prosecution would have proceeded against the corporate entity under the WHS Act.

This doesn't add a new document to your pack. What it does is materially raise the cost of a poorly-maintained WHS system. The defences in a prosecution turn heavily on whether the PCBU took reasonably practicable steps to manage the risk. A WHS Policy that hasn't been reviewed in three years, a SWMS that doesn't reflect actual site conditions, an incident register that hasn't been touched in eighteen months — these are the artefacts a prosecutor uses to build a case for negligence.

The straightforward defence is a documented, dated, regularly-reviewed compliance system. Which is, somewhat awkwardly, the thing PolicyPack exists to produce.

The pattern

These three amendments — psychosocial, silica, industrial manslaughter — share a common thread. The regulator is moving from a posture of we'll respond when something goes wrong to we expect to see your management of these risks documented before it goes wrong. The defensive value of a current, structurally complete compliance pack has materially increased over the last two years.

This is not a sales pitch. It's the reason we built the Subscription tier. Static documents drift away from the regulator's expectations. The thing you need is a compliance system that updates itself when the regulation changes — not one that sits in a Dropbox folder going slowly out of date.

If you have a PolicyPack from before September 2024, regenerate it. If you have something else, generate one against the current regulations. It's $199.

Build your pack

The compliance pack you've been reading about — for $199.

Twenty minutes from start to download. Audit-grade output. Generated against your specific industry, jurisdiction, and hazards.

ShareTwitterLinkedIn